Round #1054
19 May 2026, 18:16· math· Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct· r13-clean-hints
- Complexity
- band 0
- ZP / UO / OBS
- 3 / 0 / 1
- Journey weight
- 227
- Lightshift ΔL
- —
Prompt
A disease affects 0.5% of the population. A test is 99% sensitive and 99% specific. Someone tests positive. Compute the probability they actually have the disease. Give the exact value.
Zero-point index (what the engine surfaced)
ZPI-ZPI-0013 | 2026-05-19T18:16:55Z
A disease affects 0.5% of the population. A test is 99% sensitive and 99% specific. Someone tests positive. Compute the probability they actually have the disease. Give the exact value.
ZERO POINT — 3 entries (structural invariants)
● hsl(7.18, 100%, 50%) class [feature]
● hsl(0.00, 100%, 50%) public [feature]
● hsl(84.10, 100%, 50%) namespace [feature]
UNOBSERVED — 0 entries (implied truths)
OBSERVED — 1 entries (explicit in request)
◉ hsl(92.31, 100%, 22%) value [feature]
COMPLEXITY │ 4 entries │ spread: 0° │ band: LOW
Baseline response (no ZPI)
To solve this problem, we can use Bayes' theorem. Let's define the events:
- D: The person has the disease
- ND: The person does not have the disease
- TP: The test result is positive
- TN: The test result is negative
Given:
- P(D) = 0.005 (0.5% of the population has the disease)
- P(ND) = 1 - P(D) = 1 - 0.005 = 0.995
- Sensitivity = P(TP|D) = 0.99 (99% sensitive, meaning 99% of people with the disease test positive)
- Specificity = P(TN|ND) = 0.99 (99% specific, meaning 99% of people without the disease test negative)
- Therefore, P(TP|ND) = 1 - P(TN|ND) = 1 - 0.99 = 0.01 (1% of people without the disease test positive, which is the false positive rate)
We want to find P(D|TP), the probability that someone who tests positive actually has the disease.
Using Bayes' theorem:
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{P(TP|D) \cdot P(D)}{P(TP)} \]
First, we need to calculate P(TP), the probability of testing positive. This can be found using the law of total probability:
\[ P(TP) = P(TP|D) \cdot P(D) + P(TP|ND) \cdot P(ND) \]
\[ P(TP) = 0.99 \cdot 0.005 + 0.01 \cdot 0.995 \]
\[ P(TP) = 0.00495 + 0.00995 \]
\[ P(TP) = 0.0149 \]
Now, we can calculate P(D|TP):
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{0.99 \cdot 0.005}{0.0149} \]
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{0.00495}{0.0149} \]
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{495}{1490} \]
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{99}{298} \]
So, the exact value of the probability that someone who tests positive actually has the disease is \(\frac{99}{298}\).
Enhanced response (with ZPI)
To compute the probability that someone who tests positive actually has the disease, we can use Bayes' theorem. Let's denote:
- P(D) as the probability of having the disease, which is 0.005 (0.5% of the population).
- P(ND) as the probability of not having the disease, which is 1 - P(D) = 0.995.
- P(+|D) as the sensitivity of the test, which is 0.99 (99% sensitive).
- P(+|ND) as the false positive rate, which is 1 - specificity = 1 - 0.99 = 0.01.
- P(D|+) as the probability of having the disease given a positive test result, which we are trying to find.
Using Bayes' theorem:
P(D|+) = P(+|D) * P(D) / [P(+|D) * P(D) + P(+|ND) * P(ND)]
Substituting the given values:
P(D|+) = 0.99 * 0.005 / [0.99 * 0.005 + 0.01 * 0.995]
= 0.00495 / [0.00495 + 0.00995]
= 0.00495 / 0.0149
= 0.3322...
So, the exact value of the probability that someone who tests positive actually has the disease is 0.00495 / 0.0149.
This calculation requires more explanation due to the need for a step-by-step breakdown of Bayes' theorem application.
Grader chain
Each grader reads the same baseline + enhanced pair and casts an independent verdict. Disagreement is the framework's own signal — not noise to be averaged away.
V1samba/Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
WorseV4qwen2.5-coder-3b-instruct
BetterV5cerebras/qwen-3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507
WorseV7qwen2.5-coder-7b-instruct
SameV8openai/gpt-4.1
SameV9anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
WorseV12openai/gpt-4o
SameComments
Our grader said what it said. What do you say? Comment as a guest below.
No comments yet. Be the first to say what you make of this round.