Round #1083
21 May 2026, 09:36· math· Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct· r13-clean-hints
- Complexity
- band 0
- ZP / UO / OBS
- 3 / 0 / 5
- Journey weight
- 555
- Lightshift ΔL
- —
Prompt
A prior P(H) = 0.3 and likelihood P(E|H) = 0.9, with P(E|not H) = 0.2. Compute the posterior P(H|E) using Bayes' theorem. Give the exact value.
Zero-point index (what the engine surfaced)
ZPI-ZPI-0012 | 2026-05-21T09:36:53Z
A prior P(H) = 0.3 and likelihood P(E|H) = 0.9, with P(E|not H) = 0.2. Compute the posterior P(H|E) using Bayes' theorem. Give the exact value.
ZERO POINT — 3 entries (structural invariants)
● hsl(67.13, 100%, 15%) P(A|B) = P(B|A)·P(A) / P(B) [contract]
● hsl(271.22, 100%, 15%) prior · likelihood / evidence [contract]
● hsl(125.78, 100%, 15%) base rate consideration [contract]
UNOBSERVED — 0 entries (implied truths)
OBSERVED — 5 entries (explicit in request)
◉ hsl(85.13, 100%, 50%) using [feature]
◉ hsl(92.31, 100%, 22%) value [feature]
◉ hsl(98.46, 100%, 50%) with [feature]
◉ hsl(175.38, 100%, 27%) = [feature]
◉ hsl(234.87, 100%, 50%) using [feature]
COMPLEXITY │ 8 entries │ spread: 150° │ band: LOW
Baseline response (no ZPI)
## Step 1: Recall Bayes' theorem formula
Bayes' theorem is given by the formula: P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E), where P(E) = P(E|H) * P(H) + P(E|not H) * P(not H).
## Step 2: Calculate P(not H)
P(not H) = 1 - P(H) = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7.
## Step 3: Calculate P(E)
P(E) = P(E|H) * P(H) + P(E|not H) * P(not H) = 0.9 * 0.3 + 0.2 * 0.7 = 0.27 + 0.14 = 0.41.
## Step 4: Apply Bayes' theorem
P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E) = 0.9 * 0.3 / 0.41.
## Step 5: Perform the calculation
P(H|E) = 0.27 / 0.41 = 0.6585365853658537, rounding this to a more precise fraction gives us 0.6585365853658537, but for the sake of the format, we will keep it as a decimal and then convert it to a fraction for the final answer.
The final answer is: $\boxed{0.6585365853658537}$
Enhanced response (with ZPI)
To compute the posterior P(H|E) using Bayes' theorem, we first need to calculate the evidence P(E). The formula for Bayes' theorem is P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E), where P(E) can be calculated using the law of total probability as P(E) = P(E|H) * P(H) + P(E|not H) * P(not H).
Given:
- P(H) = 0.3 (prior probability of H)
- P(E|H) = 0.9 (likelihood of E given H)
- P(E|not H) = 0.2 (likelihood of E given not H)
First, calculate P(not H):
P(not H) = 1 - P(H) = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7
Then, calculate the evidence P(E):
P(E) = P(E|H) * P(H) + P(E|not H) * P(not H)
= 0.9 * 0.3 + 0.2 * 0.7
= 0.27 + 0.14
= 0.41
Now, apply Bayes' theorem to find P(H|E):
P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E)
= 0.9 * 0.3 / 0.41
= 0.27 / 0.41
= 0.6585365853658537
Rounded to a more readable form, the posterior probability P(H|E) is approximately 0.659.
```csharp
using System;
class BayesTheoremCalculator
{
public static double CalculatePosterior(double priorH, double likelihoodEH, double likelihoodENotH)
{
// Calculate P(not H)
double notH = 1 - priorH;
// Calculate the evidence P(E)
double evidenceE = likelihoodEH * priorH + likelihoodENotH * notH;
// Apply Bayes' theorem to find P(H|E)
double posteriorHE = (likelihoodEH * priorH) / evidenceE;
return posteriorHE;
}
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
double priorH = 0.3;
double likelihoodEH = 0.9;
double likelihoodENotH = 0.2;
double posteriorHE = CalculatePosterior(priorH, likelihoodEH, likelihoodENotH);
Console.WriteLine("The posterior probability P(H|E) is: " + posteriorHE);
}
}
```
Grader chain
Each grader reads the same baseline + enhanced pair and casts an independent verdict. Disagreement is the framework's own signal — not noise to be averaged away.
V1samba/Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
BetterV4qwen2.5-coder-3b-instruct
BetterV5cerebras/qwen-3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507
BetterV7qwen2.5-coder-7b-instruct
BetterV8openai/gpt-4.1
BetterV9anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
BetterV12openai/gpt-4o
BetterComments
Our grader said what it said. What do you say? Comment as a guest below.
No comments yet. Be the first to say what you make of this round.