Round #1083

21 May 2026, 09:36· math· Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct· r13-clean-hints
Complexity
band 0
ZP / UO / OBS
3 / 0 / 5
Journey weight
555
Lightshift ΔL

Prompt

A prior P(H) = 0.3 and likelihood P(E|H) = 0.9, with P(E|not H) = 0.2. Compute the posterior P(H|E) using Bayes' theorem. Give the exact value.

Zero-point index (what the engine surfaced)

ZPI-ZPI-0012 | 2026-05-21T09:36:53Z A prior P(H) = 0.3 and likelihood P(E|H) = 0.9, with P(E|not H) = 0.2. Compute the posterior P(H|E) using Bayes' theorem. Give the exact value. ZERO POINT — 3 entries (structural invariants) ● hsl(67.13, 100%, 15%) P(A|B) = P(B|A)·P(A) / P(B) [contract] ● hsl(271.22, 100%, 15%) prior · likelihood / evidence [contract] ● hsl(125.78, 100%, 15%) base rate consideration [contract] UNOBSERVED — 0 entries (implied truths) OBSERVED — 5 entries (explicit in request) ◉ hsl(85.13, 100%, 50%) using [feature] ◉ hsl(92.31, 100%, 22%) value [feature] ◉ hsl(98.46, 100%, 50%) with [feature] ◉ hsl(175.38, 100%, 27%) = [feature] ◉ hsl(234.87, 100%, 50%) using [feature] COMPLEXITY │ 8 entries │ spread: 150° │ band: LOW

Baseline response (no ZPI)

## Step 1: Recall Bayes' theorem formula Bayes' theorem is given by the formula: P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E), where P(E) = P(E|H) * P(H) + P(E|not H) * P(not H). ## Step 2: Calculate P(not H) P(not H) = 1 - P(H) = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7. ## Step 3: Calculate P(E) P(E) = P(E|H) * P(H) + P(E|not H) * P(not H) = 0.9 * 0.3 + 0.2 * 0.7 = 0.27 + 0.14 = 0.41. ## Step 4: Apply Bayes' theorem P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E) = 0.9 * 0.3 / 0.41. ## Step 5: Perform the calculation P(H|E) = 0.27 / 0.41 = 0.6585365853658537, rounding this to a more precise fraction gives us 0.6585365853658537, but for the sake of the format, we will keep it as a decimal and then convert it to a fraction for the final answer. The final answer is: $\boxed{0.6585365853658537}$

Enhanced response (with ZPI)

To compute the posterior P(H|E) using Bayes' theorem, we first need to calculate the evidence P(E). The formula for Bayes' theorem is P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E), where P(E) can be calculated using the law of total probability as P(E) = P(E|H) * P(H) + P(E|not H) * P(not H). Given: - P(H) = 0.3 (prior probability of H) - P(E|H) = 0.9 (likelihood of E given H) - P(E|not H) = 0.2 (likelihood of E given not H) First, calculate P(not H): P(not H) = 1 - P(H) = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7 Then, calculate the evidence P(E): P(E) = P(E|H) * P(H) + P(E|not H) * P(not H) = 0.9 * 0.3 + 0.2 * 0.7 = 0.27 + 0.14 = 0.41 Now, apply Bayes' theorem to find P(H|E): P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E) = 0.9 * 0.3 / 0.41 = 0.27 / 0.41 = 0.6585365853658537 Rounded to a more readable form, the posterior probability P(H|E) is approximately 0.659. ```csharp using System; class BayesTheoremCalculator { public static double CalculatePosterior(double priorH, double likelihoodEH, double likelihoodENotH) { // Calculate P(not H) double notH = 1 - priorH; // Calculate the evidence P(E) double evidenceE = likelihoodEH * priorH + likelihoodENotH * notH; // Apply Bayes' theorem to find P(H|E) double posteriorHE = (likelihoodEH * priorH) / evidenceE; return posteriorHE; } public static void Main(string[] args) { double priorH = 0.3; double likelihoodEH = 0.9; double likelihoodENotH = 0.2; double posteriorHE = CalculatePosterior(priorH, likelihoodEH, likelihoodENotH); Console.WriteLine("The posterior probability P(H|E) is: " + posteriorHE); } } ```

Grader chain

Each grader reads the same baseline + enhanced pair and casts an independent verdict. Disagreement is the framework's own signal — not noise to be averaged away.

V1samba/Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Better
V4qwen2.5-coder-3b-instruct
Better
V5cerebras/qwen-3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507
Better
V7qwen2.5-coder-7b-instruct
Better
V8openai/gpt-4.1
Better
V9anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
Better
V12openai/gpt-4o
Better

Comments

Our grader said what it said. What do you say? Comment as a guest below.

No comments yet. Be the first to say what you make of this round.

← back to all rounds