Round #1084
21 May 2026, 09:37· math· Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct· r13-clean-hints
- Complexity
- band 0
- ZP / UO / OBS
- 3 / 0 / 1
- Journey weight
- 227
- Lightshift ΔL
- —
Prompt
A disease affects 2% of the population. A test is 90% sensitive and 95% specific. Someone tests positive. Compute the probability they actually have the disease. Give the exact value.
Zero-point index (what the engine surfaced)
ZPI-ZPI-0013 | 2026-05-21T09:37:07Z
A disease affects 2% of the population. A test is 90% sensitive and 95% specific. Someone tests positive. Compute the probability they actually have the disease. Give the exact value.
ZERO POINT — 3 entries (structural invariants)
● hsl(7.18, 100%, 50%) class [feature]
● hsl(0.00, 100%, 50%) public [feature]
● hsl(84.10, 100%, 50%) namespace [feature]
UNOBSERVED — 0 entries (implied truths)
OBSERVED — 1 entries (explicit in request)
◉ hsl(92.31, 100%, 22%) value [feature]
COMPLEXITY │ 4 entries │ spread: 0° │ band: LOW
Baseline response (no ZPI)
To solve this problem, we can use Bayes' theorem. Let's define the events:
- D: The person has the disease.
- ND: The person does not have the disease.
- TP: The test result is positive.
- TN: The test result is negative.
Given:
- P(D) = 0.02 (2% of the population has the disease)
- P(ND) = 1 - P(D) = 0.98
- Sensitivity = P(TP|D) = 0.90 (90% chance of testing positive if you have the disease)
- Specificity = P(TN|ND) = 0.95 (95% chance of testing negative if you don't have the disease)
- Therefore, P(TP|ND) = 1 - P(TN|ND) = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05
We want to find P(D|TP), the probability that someone has the disease given that they tested positive.
Using Bayes' theorem:
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{P(TP|D) \cdot P(D)}{P(TP)} \]
First, we need to calculate P(TP), the probability of testing positive. This can happen in two ways: either you have the disease and test positive, or you don't have the disease and test positive.
\[ P(TP) = P(TP|D) \cdot P(D) + P(TP|ND) \cdot P(ND) \]
\[ P(TP) = 0.90 \cdot 0.02 + 0.05 \cdot 0.98 \]
\[ P(TP) = 0.018 + 0.049 \]
\[ P(TP) = 0.067 \]
Now, we can calculate P(D|TP):
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{0.90 \cdot 0.02}{0.067} \]
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{0.018}{0.067} \]
\[ P(D|TP) = \frac{18}{67} \]
So, the exact probability that someone who tests positive actually has the disease is \(\frac{18}{67}\).
Enhanced response (with ZPI)
To compute the probability that someone who tests positive actually has the disease, we can use Bayes' theorem. Let's denote:
- P(D) as the probability of having the disease, which is 2% or 0.02.
- P(ND) as the probability of not having the disease, which is 100% - 2% = 98% or 0.98.
- P(+|D) as the sensitivity of the test, which is 90% or 0.9. This is the probability of testing positive given that you have the disease.
- P(+|ND) as the false positive rate, which is 100% - specificity = 100% - 95% = 5% or 0.05. This is the probability of testing positive given that you do not have the disease.
We want to find P(D|+), the probability of having the disease given that you test positive. Bayes' theorem states:
P(D|+) = P(+|D) * P(D) / P(+)
Where P(+) is the probability of testing positive, which can be calculated as:
P(+) = P(+|D) * P(D) + P(+|ND) * P(ND)
Substituting the given values:
P(+) = 0.9 * 0.02 + 0.05 * 0.98
= 0.018 + 0.049
= 0.067
Now, using Bayes' theorem:
P(D|+) = 0.9 * 0.02 / 0.067
= 0.018 / 0.067
= 0.268657
So, the exact value of the probability that someone who tests positive actually has the disease is approximately 0.268657 or 26.8657%.
Grader chain
Each grader reads the same baseline + enhanced pair and casts an independent verdict. Disagreement is the framework's own signal — not noise to be averaged away.
V1samba/Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
WorseV4qwen2.5-coder-3b-instruct
BetterV5cerebras/qwen-3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507
WorseV7qwen2.5-coder-7b-instruct
BetterV8openai/gpt-4.1
WorseV9anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
WorseV12openai/gpt-4o
SameComments
Our grader said what it said. What do you say? Comment as a guest below.
No comments yet. Be the first to say what you make of this round.