Round #975

12 May 2026, 13:36· hr-law· gpt-4.1· r13-clean-hints
Complexity
band 0
ZP / UO / OBS
3 / 0 / 1
Journey weight
232
Lightshift ΔL
-0.17

Prompt

We are restructuring and one of three identical roles is no longer needed. How do we decide which employees are in the selection pool for redundancy?

Zero-point index (what the engine surfaced)

ZPI-ZPI-0004 | 2026-05-12T13:36:41Z We are restructuring and one of three identical roles is no longer needed. How do we decide which employees are in the selection pool for redundancy? ZERO POINT — 3 entries (structural invariants) ● hsl(142.90, 100%, 42%) selection criteria [contract] ● hsl(124.95, 100%, 42%) individual consultation [contract] ● hsl(69.11, 100%, 42%) statutory redundancy pay [contract] UNOBSERVED — 0 entries (implied truths) OBSERVED — 1 entries (explicit in request) ◉ hsl(251.00, 100%, 42%) selection pool [feature] COMPLEXITY │ 4 entries │ spread: 0° │ band: LOW

Baseline response (no ZPI)

In a redundancy situation where you have three identical roles and only need two, **the selection pool should include all employees who are performing the same or very similar roles that are at risk**. Here’s how you decide who is in the selection pool: ### 1. **Identify the ‘at risk’ roles** - List all employees whose jobs are the same or substantially similar to the role being reduced. - In your case, all three employees in the identical roles are ‘at risk’. ### 2. **Define the selection pool** - The selection pool should include **all employees doing the same job** (i.e., the three employees in the identical roles). - Do not include employees in different roles, unless their roles are interchangeable or could be affected by the restructure. ### 3. **Check for exceptions** - If any of the three employees are on fixed-term contracts ending soon, or are temporary/agency staff, you may need to consider whether they should be included. - If any of the roles are genuinely unique (e.g., one person has a specialist function not shared by the others), you may be able to justify a narrower pool, but this must be objectively justified. ### 4. **Legal and Fairness Considerations** - The selection pool must be fair, objective, and non-discriminatory. - Document your reasoning for the pool selection. ### **Summary Table** | Employee | Role Title | Duties Identical? | In Selection Pool? | |----------|----------------|-------------------|-------------------| | A | Analyst | Yes | Yes | | B | Analyst | Yes | Yes | | C | Analyst | Yes | Yes | **All three are in the selection pool.** --- **Next Steps:** Once the pool is defined, you should apply a fair and objective selection criteria (e.g., skills, experience, disciplinary record, performance) to decide which employee will be made redundant. **References:** - [UK Government: Redundancy - Your rights](https://www.gov.uk/redundant-your-rights/being-selected-for-redundancy) - [ACAS: Redundancy: step by step](https://www.acas.org.uk/redundancy/being-selected-for-redundancy) If you need help with selection criteria or the redundancy process, let me know!

Enhanced response (with ZPI)

The selection pool for redundancy should include all employees performing the same or very similar roles to the one being eliminated—in this case, all three employees in the identical roles—so that fair and objective selection criteria can be applied to determine which individual is selected for redundancy.

Grader chain

Each grader reads the same baseline + enhanced pair and casts an independent verdict. Disagreement is the framework's own signal — not noise to be averaged away.

V1samba/Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Better
V4qwen2.5-coder-3b-instruct
Better
V5openrouter/qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507
Same
V7qwen2.5-coder-7b-instruct
Same
V8openai/gpt-4.1
Worse
V9anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
Better
V12openai/gpt-4o
Worse

Comments

Our grader said what it said. What do you say? Comment as a guest below.

No comments yet. Be the first to say what you make of this round.

← back to all rounds